Jose Rizal Essay

I. IntroductionJose rizal and andress bonifacio, always heard of those name? what almost their contribution and sacrifices for you as a Philippine? have you heard/know something ab off it? cardinal people with the selfsame(prenominal) propensity and love for the country but has different beliefs and ways on acquiring their wants. Two people who came from the past and lived a greatest ascertain on the history of our nation, a men who awaken the desire of all(prenominal) indios in acquiring the freedom that was taken away from them for almost ccc years. Jose rizal was known from being the national hero of the Philippines.Who wouldnt know about him? He was in every history book of phil. Same as bonifacio. They both sacrifice their lives to prove how much they love their country and for their desire to see the Philippines as a country having its own freedom and sovereignity. This research paper will tackle the nationalistic movement of jose rizal and andress abonifacio. II. Jose Rizal and his Nationalistic performanceJose Rizal felt so guilty in Spaniards of being harsh and abusing Philippine people. Rizal form a organization called propaganda movement. The Propaganda Movement was a literary and ethnical organization formed in 1872 by Jose Rizal. The aim of the propaganda movement was a peaceful assimilation, referring to the convert of the Philippines from being a colony to a state of matter of Spain. These reforms were as follows equality of the Filipinos and Spaniards before the laws restoration of the Philippine representation in the Spanish Cortes secularization of the Philippine parishes and theexpulsion of the friars, and human rights for Filipinos, such as freedom of speech. Freedom of the press and freedom to meet and petition for recompense of grievances.Those who join this peaceful campaign were the Filipino exiles of 1872, the patriots who left the islands to escape persecution, and those who had been to Spain for their studies. some other Movent of Jose Rizal is The La Liga Filipina. social background is illumined and concretely defined by mortal acts of intervention, such as Rizals novels, without which society and the physical world last out indifferent. We need this dialectical approach to comprehend in a much all-encompassing way Rizals vexed and vexing situation, together with his fastidiously calculated responsesall cunning ruses of Reason in history (for Hegel). such(prenominal) ruses actually register the contradictions of social forces in real life, reflected in the crises of lives in each generation.The substantial biographies of Rizalfrom Austin Craig to Rafael Palma, Leon Maria Guerrero to Austin Coatesall seek to triangulate the ideas of the hero with his varying positions in his family, in the circle of his friends and colleagues in Europe, and in relation to the colonial Establishment. Their main concern is to find out the origin of the heros thoughts and their impact on the local environment. so lely the twin errors of contemplative objectivism and individualist bias persisted in vitiating their accounts. They ignored the historical-materialist proverb that the changing of circumstances and of person-to-person sensibility/minds, as Marx advised, can be conceived and rationally understood only as revolutionary practicethat is, aesthetical collective praxis in material life.In Palmas biography, for example, the impertinence of Rizals project of the Liga Filipina became simply a means to defray the expenses of the resolution of Borneo (1949, 202 see Zaide and Zaide 1984). In reality, the Liga is the chief emblematic index of that transformative praxis fusing personal experience and objective circumstances. It is the crucible marking the failure of La Solidaridad reformism and the transition to the stage of popular mobilization mediated by the rising constitutive(a) intellectuals of the dispossessed, in particular Andres Bonifacio, Jacinto, and others. Rizals radicalizin g agenda was already distilled in his intrepid testimony of communicative action, the eloquent Letter to the Women of Malolos(more later), and articulated in the two letters dated June 20, 1892, letters whose resonance andvalue canperhaps be compared only to St. Pauls epistles to the early converts of the faith.By all accounts, the makeup of the Liga is the key event marking Rizals leap from intellectual gradualism to collective separatism. Before his exile to Dapitan in 1892, Rizal met with members of the Masonic Balagtas Lodge in the fellowship of Doroteo Onjungco, including Ambrosio Salvador, Timoteo Paez, Pedro Serrano, Domingo Franco, and, last but not least, Andres Bonifacio, who was then not distinguishable from the bunch of about thirty individuals.After Governor Despujol decreed Rizals banishment, the Liga members met secretly in the Azcarraga apartment of Deodato Arellano, among them Andres Bonifacio and Gregorio Del Pilar, who later died fighting American troops prose cute the fleeing Aguinaldo headed for Palanan (Palma 1949, 225). That historic gathering of seven persons signaled the launching of the Katipunan, The organization of sons of the people committed to overthrowing Spanish colonial tyranny.Referenceshttp//reference.allrefer.com/country-guide-study/philippines/philippines20.html http//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Propaganda_Movementhttp//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Filipino_nationalism